| 樊秀娣，李维维.美国高等教育评估机构两种资质认证标准的比较研究[J].上海教育评估研究,2017,6(5):45-50 |
| 美国高等教育评估机构两种资质认证标准的比较研究 |
| Analysis of Recognition Standards for Accrediting Agencies under Official and Civil Mechanisms in the United States |
| 投稿时间：2017-06-14 修订日期：2017-09-06 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 高等教育 第三方评估机构 资质认证标准 |
| 英文关键词:Higher education The third-party assessment agency Accreditation standards |
| 基金项目:基金项目：上海市哲学社会科学规划委托招标课题“多元参与教育质量评价体系的制度性建构及其路径研究”（2016WJW003）的阶段成果。 |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 5058 |
| 全文下载次数: 7979 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 为保证高等教育认证活动的有序开展， 美国官方联邦教育部和民间高等教育认证理事会对认证机构发布了两套认证标准，这两套标准在对认证机构的资格要求、组织管理、认证程序、影响成效等四方面有相似之处，但在对认证机构的发展性、资质认定标准的科学性、标准使用的灵活性方面各有特点。结合我国大力推进教育管办评分离的需要，美国两套资质认证标准的共性与个性的特征对促进我国第三方教育评估机构发展内外因素和规律提供了参考。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| In order to ensure the quality of higher education certification, Department: of: Education and Council for Higher Education Accreditation, the United States, implement official
and civil two accreditation standards for accrediting agencies. In the four parts of certification qualification, organization management, accrediting procedure, and the effects, the two standards are quite similar; but the development of accrediting agencies; the science of standard and the flexibility of standard use are different, each standard:has its own characteristics. In combination with the practical needs of further promoting education management and evaluation in China,the comparison of the two standards has the certain enlightenment for the development: of the third party evaluation agencies in China. |
| 查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
