| 李旭芝，龙 佳.我国高校课堂教学评价方式与路径重构[J].上海教育评估研究,2021,10(5):69-74 |
| 我国高校课堂教学评价方式与路径重构 |
| Teaching Evaluation Methods in Chinese Universities and the Path Reconstruction |
| |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 高校 课堂教学 教学评价 方式与路径重构 |
| 英文关键词:Universities Classroom teaching Teaching evaluation Methods and path reconstruction |
| 基金项目:湖南省研究生科研创新项目资助“高校教学管理制度对教师教学行为的影响研究”（CX20200691） |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 750 |
| 全文下载次数: 2338 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 教学评价是我国促进教师教学行为改进、提升教师教学效率的重要手段之一，教学评价的重要性不容忽视。我国高校教学评价的方式主要包括学生评价、同行评价、督导评价等。文章探究教学评价的特征与运作逻辑。通过分析高校课堂教学评价方式和高校的个案访谈，发现教学评价存在下述问题：推崇管理价值，忽略多元价值取向，目的与手段倒置，利益引导下的理性计算，评价制度真实性的缺失。针对这些问题，提出相应的评价方式的重构路径：关注多元价值目标，促进人的发展；重塑教学目的，重视师生双向发展；扩大同行评价群体，降低利益共谋风险；转变督导评价方式，设置相应评价标准。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Teaching evaluation is one of the important means to improve teachers’ teaching behavior and teaching efficiency in China. The importance of teaching evaluation cannot be ignored. The teaching evaluation methods mainly include student evaluation, peer evaluation, and supervisory evaluation and so on. This paper explores the characteristics and operational logic of teaching evaluation. By analyzing the status of classroom teaching and using narrative interviews of several cases in universities,this paper has found that there are problems of advocating management value, ignoring multiple value orientations, inversion of purpose and means, rational calculation under the guidance of interests and lack of authenticity of the evaluation system. In view of the problems, the reconstruction path of evaluation methods is proposed: focusing on multiple value goals and promoting human development, reshaping the purpose of teaching and attaching importance to the two-way development of teachers and students, expanding peer evaluation groups to reduce the risk of collusion of interests, and changing the way of supervisory evaluation and setting corresponding evaluation standards. |
| 查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
