《上海教育评估研究》编辑部

陈亚艳，罗新祜.学科评估主义的困境与突围[J].上海教育评估研究,2023,12(5):6-11

学科评估主义的困境与突围

The Dilemma and Breakthrough of Discipline Evaluation Doctrine

DOI：

英文关键词:Discipline evaluation doctrine Instrumental rationality Value rationality

基金项目:江西省高校人文社会科学研究青年项目“高等学校一流学科评价研究——以江西高等学校为例”（JY18224）；江西省教育厅科技项目“江西高等院校一流学科评价研究”（GJJ180768）；江西省社科规划项目“中国高等教育绩效拨款政策体系、问题以及推进策略研究”（20JY22）。

作者	单位
陈亚艳，罗新祜	赣南师范大学经济管理学院，江西赣州 341000

摘要点击次数: 743

全文下载次数: 1069

中文摘要:

工具理性与价值理性是学科建设与评估所蕴含的两个重要方面。但近年来在学科评估过程中，工具理性过分扩张导致工具理性对价值理性僭越并形成学科评估主义。学科评估主义的问题主要表征为强调评价显性指标忽视学科内在价值、强调学科评估统一性忽视学科差异性、“马太效应”明显、手段与目的本末倒置四个方面，问题根源主要在于学科评估动力机制为行政而非学术、学科评估定位是管理工具而非学科建设本身、评估结果的使用捆绑太多利益三个方面。为解决学科评估主义的困境，实现工具理性对价值理性的回归，要进一步强化学科分类评估，构建中国特色的学科评估体系，淡化学科评估的行政色彩，使学科评估回归评估本身。

英文摘要:

Instrumental rationality and value rationality are two important aspects of discipline construction and evaluation. However, in recent years, in the process of discipline evaluation, due to the excessive expansion of instrumental rationality, the instrumental rationality oversteps the value rationality and forms the discipline evaluation doctrine. This paper finds that the dominant evaluation index ignores the intrinsic value, discipline evaluation emphasizes on unity while ignoring discipline differences, “Matthew effect” is obvious, methods and purposes have the order reversed. The root mainly lies in three aspects: dynamic mechanism of discipline evaluation is administrative rather than academic, the positioning of discipline evaluation is management tool rather than discipline construction, and the use of evaluation results is bundled with too much interests. In order to solve the dilemma of discipline evaluation doctrine and realize the return of instrumental rationality to value rationality, we should further strengthen the classified evaluation of disciplines, build the discipline evaluation system with Chinese characteristics, dilute the administrative color of discipline evaluation, and make discipline evaluation return to the evaluation itself.

查看全文查看/发表评论下载PDF阅读器

关闭