| 刘 波，宋茂荣.美国第三方教育评估机构治理现状与启示[J].上海教育评估研究,2023,12(6):53-57 |
| 美国第三方教育评估机构治理现状与启示 |
| The Governance Logic and Enlightenment of American Third-party Educational Assessment Institutions |
| |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 美国教育评估 评估机构治理 第三方教育评估 |
| 英文关键词:Educational assessment of America Governance of assessment institutions Third-party educational assessment |
| 基金项目:2019年贵州省哲学社会科学重点课题“第三方教育评估机构培育与管理对策研究”（19GZZD19）。 |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 439 |
| 全文下载次数: 877 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 美国第三方教育评估机构有漫长的发展历程，逐渐形成以美国教育部和高等教育认证委员会为治理主体、多种教育评估机构为治理客体的格局，其治理方式核心表征是资质认可，即通过审核第三方教育评估机构的资质，为不同类型第三方教育评估机构的自律发展提供土壤。借鉴美国经验，推进我国教育管办评分离改革，应坚持分类治理导向，明晰不同类型评估机构的资质标准，促进评估机构的多元发展；培育健康评估文化，引领评估机构形成健康的价值取向；构建行业自律机制，规范我国评估机构行业行为。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| After a long history of development, the third-party educational assessment institutions in the United States have gradually formed a pattern that the U.S. Department of Education and the Higher Education Certification Commission are the governance subjects and a variety of educational assessment institutions are the governance objects. The core of its governance is “qualification recognition”, that is to say， they provide soil for the self-discipline development of different types of third-party educational assessment institutions by reviewing their qualifications. To learn from the beneficial experience of the United States, we should firstly promote the reform of the separation of supervision， enforcement and evaluation. Secondly, we should adhere to the orientation of classified governance, clarify the qualification standards of different types of assessment institutions， and promote the diversified development of assessment institutions. Meanwhile, we should cultivate health assessment culture and lead assessment institutions to form healthy value orientation. Lastly, we should build a self-discipline mechanism to regulate the behavior of assessment institutions. |
| 查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
