| 王馨然.美国一流研究型大学教师晋升的评价标准及过程保障[J].上海教育评估研究,2024,13(2):67-71 |
| 美国一流研究型大学教师晋升的评价标准及过程保障 |
| The Evaluation Standard and Process Guarantee of Teacher Promotion in First-class Research Universities in USA |
| |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 高等教育 研究型大学 教师晋升评价 同行评议 |
| 英文关键词:Higher education Research universities Teacher promotion evaluation Peer review |
| 基金项目:厦门大学研究生田野调查基金项目“学术型硕士生拔尖创新人才培养的跨学科模式研究”（2023FG011）。 |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 328 |
| 全文下载次数: 623 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 通过对10所美国一流研究型大学的案例分析，发现其教师晋升评价坚持“不以数量定质量”的整体性原则，在评价标准上强调教师一流学者的身份定位、重视多元形式的创造性学术成果、关注教师潜力等能力发展，以及注重学术成果的影响和贡献。在过程保障上，构建了自下而上的校内审查制度和基于比较的同行评议制度，并以校内主体的分权制衡、严格的同行专家准入、完备的申诉、回避和保密制度保障了评价过程的规范性和专业性。这启示我国高校应发挥教师晋升评价的发展性功能，推动同行评议制度的理性回归，加强评价过程中的教师权益保障。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Through multi-case analysis of 10 first-class research universities in the United States, it is found that they adhere to the holistic principle of“not quantity but quality”in the evaluation of teacher promotion. In terms of evaluation criteria, it emphasizes the identity of teachers as“first-class scholars”, values the creative academic achievements in multiple forms, highlights the development of teachers’potential and other abilities, and underlines the influence and contribution of academic achievements. In the process guarantee, they have constructed a bottom-up internal review system and a peer review system based on comparison. The separation of powers of the main body of the universities, strict access to peer experts and a complete system of complaints, avoidance and confidentiality have ensured the professionalism and fairness. This reveals that first-class universities in China should give full play to the developmental function of teacher promotion evaluation, promote the rational return of peer review system, and strengthen the protection of the teachers’rights and interests in the evaluation process. |
| 查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
