| 邵 芳，雷 玥.中英高校教师绩效评价的比较研究与启示[J].上海教育评估研究,2024,13(4):61-67 |
| 中英高校教师绩效评价的比较研究与启示 |
| Comparative Research and Enlightenment on the Performance Evaluation of Teachers in Chinese and British Universities |
| |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: “双一流”建设 高校教师 绩效管理 绩效评价 高等教育评估 |
| 英文关键词:"Double first-class" construction University teachers Performance management Performance evaluation Higher education evaluation |
| 基金项目:国家留学基金委资助项目“2019年国外教育调研专项访问学者项目”（201906965060）；国家自然科学基金项目“复合型视角下人力资源管理对组织支持作用机制的多阶段动态研究”（71302111）。 |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 803 |
| 全文下载次数: 67 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 在高校教师绩效评价的体系建设和内容建设上，英国作为最早提出发展性教师评价制度的国家，其经验有一定参考价值。以英国大学教师评价为参考对象，具体分析中英高校教师绩效评价的目的、主体、方法、指标，并总结出两国高校教师绩效评价的特点。最终得出如下结论：我国高校教师绩效评价应结合教师不同类型，建立差异化层次化考评体系；强化教师主体地位，建立多元评价与内外结合的激励模式；绩效沟通贯穿全过程，形成双向发展的双向互动模式；设置差异化考评周期，建设动态机制缓解教师压力；转变评价结果导向，实现评价的发展功能。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| In terms of the system construction and content construction of performance evaluation of university teachers， Britain, as the first country to put forward the developmental teacher evaluation system, has certain reference value. Taking the British university teacher evaluation as the reference object, this paper analyzes the purpose, subject, method and index of the performance evaluation of Chinese and British university teachers, and summarizes the characteristics of the performance evaluation of university teachers in both countries. Finally, it is concluded that the different types of teachers should be combined to establish a differentiated and hierarchical evaluation system. Secondly, it should strengthen teachers' main position, establish the incentive model of multiple evaluation and internal and external combination. Thirdly, performance communication should run through the whole process, forming a two-way interactive model of two-way development. Fourthly, differentiated evaluation cycle and dynamic mechanism should be set to relieve teacher pressure. Finally, the evaluation result orientation should be changed to realize the developmental function of evaluation. |
| 查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
