| 摘要: |
| 亚太地区教育质量保障注册制（APQR）作为对教育质量保障机构的一种国际性、非政府、自律性的约束和规制活动，在评估质量保障方面起到了重要作用。根据8家教育质量保障机构对APQR评审满意度的分析，发现APQR评审符合“第四代评估理论”的理念。从评审依据来看，APQR是建构主义的动态化评审；从评审重点来看，APQR重点审视质量保障机构开放、包容以及公信力三大方面；从评审结果来看，APQR灵活运用四个等级来进行综合判断。APQR具有可供借鉴的评审经验，但仍存在需要改进之处以更好实现可持续发展。 |
| 关键词: 亚太地区教育质量保障注册制 元评估 教育质量保障 可持续发展评估 |
| DOI： |
|
| 基金项目:亚太地区教育质量保障组织（APQN）2021年重点研究项目“the Research on the Asia-Pacific Quality Register (APQR)”（APQR2021-01)。 |
|
| Research on the Meta-review of Asia-Pacific Quality Register （APQR） |
| XIANG Zhijie1，ZHANG Jianxin1，Jagannath PATIL2 |
| (1. Research Institute of Higher Education, Yunnan University, Kunming, Yunnan 650091; 2. National Assessment and Accreditation Council, Bengalore, Karnataka 560002, India) |
| Abstract: |
| APQR, as an international, non-governmental, self-disciplined constraint and regulation activity for the QAAs, has played an important role in reviewing quality assurance. Firstly, this research makes a comparative analysis of APQR’s 8 QAAs under 11 criterion. Secondly, based on the Survey of Satisfaction Level of APQR Review, it is found that APQR review conforms to the concept of “the fourth generation evaluation”. From the review basis, APQR is a dynamic review under constructivism. From the review focus, APQR focuses on three aspects, i.e., openness, inclusiveness and credibility. From the review results, APQR flexibly uses four levels to conduct comprehensive review. Therefore, APQR has review experiences that can be used for reference, but it still needs to be improved in order to better achieve the goal of APQR’s sustainable development. |
| Key words: Asia-Pacific Quality Register (APQR) Meta-evaluation Education quality assurance Evaluation of sustainable development |
