quotation:[Copy]
[Copy]
【Print page】 【Online reading】 【PDF Full text】 View/Add CommentDownload reader Close

←Previous page|Page Next →

Back Issue    Advanced search

This Paper:Browse 2201   Download 2885 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
对新一轮学科排名热的理性思考
董云川1,徐娟2
0
(云南大学,1.高等教育研究院;2.马列主义研究院, 云南,昆明 650091)
摘要:
学科排名作为教育质量保障体系中不可或缺的一种手段,其功用有益而有限。此次学科排名有益于高校摸清家底、促进高校间的竞争、推动高校内涵建设和让公众了解高校;但同时也存在难以量化高校“育人”水平,评估指标容易导致高校同质化以及评估透明度有待加强等有限性。面对新一轮排名热,高校要积极而理智,化“外在功利趋向”为“内在理性自为”,并坚持“有所为,有所不为”,方能够持续推进学科质量建设。
关键词:  学科排名  学科质量建设  理性思考
DOI:
Received:April 20, 2013Revised:May 12, 2013
基金项目:
Rational Thinking on the New Round of Discipline Ranking
Dong Yunchuan1,Xu Juan2
(1.Institute of Higher Education Research;2.Institute of Marx’s Research, Yunnan University, Kunming,Yunnan 650091)
Abstract:
As an object and an external method in the education quality assurance system, discipline ranking has a'beneficial but limited function.The 2012 discipline ranking can help unversities Rnowing theirselves well, and can promote their competition. It can also help the can not ation conotruction, and can help people to understand these uniuersities. But the ranking hao its limitation. For example, it cannot reflect the level of talents training, may lead to homogeni zation and the assesement should be enhanced etc. Facing a new round of discipline ranking aetus, universities should stand in the rational height, change attitude from“external utilitarian tendency” to “internal rational literature”, use discipline ranking results rationally, and analyze the interface between action and inaction to promote the discipline quality construction actively .
Key words:  Discipline ranking  Discipline quality construction  Rational consideration