quotation:[Copy]
[Copy]
【Print page】 【Online reading】 【PDF Full text】 View/Add CommentDownload reader Close

←Previous page|Page Next →

Back Issue    Advanced search

This Paper:Browse 2475   Download 2762 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
不要误读“高校学科排行榜”
熊丙奇
0
(21世纪教育研究院,上海 200030)
摘要:
今年年初,教育部学位与研究生教育发展中心发布了“2012 年全国391 所高校学科排行榜”,对于这一排行榜,社会普遍存在两方面误读。本文对这一学科评估的性质和排名结果进行了分析,并指出只有政府退出行政评价,回归本位,把办学自主权交给大学,把评价权交给社会专业机构,我国的高校才能走出特色办学之路。
关键词:  学科评估  行政评价  办学特色
DOI:
Received:April 02, 2013Revised:May 10, 2013
基金项目:
Avoid Misinterpretation of the“University Discipline Rankings”
Xiong Bingqi
(21 Century Education Academy, Shanghai 200030)
Abstract:
In the beginning of this year, the Academic Degrees and Graduate Education Development Center of China Ministry of Education has published the University Discipline Rankings of 391 Universities in China. The“ University Discipline Rankings” has widespread misinterpretation generally in two aspects. In this paper, I analyze the nature and ranking results of the subject assessment, and point out that as long as the government withdraws from administrative evaluation and regresses to its standard, while granting school autonomy to universities and evaluation right to socio-professional organizations, China’s universities can have their own characteristics in running universities.
Key words:  Discipline assessment  Administrative*evaluation  Characteristics in running university