| 摘要: |
| 以2017 年全国学科评估的数据为基础，对我国师范类院校学科评估的情况进行多角度的排名分析，并选取其中位居前列的院校作进一步研究，划分为若干个集团，对处于不同集团师范院校的学科实力进行比较，包括比较各自获A+ 学科的情况，及在人文类学科、艺术类学科、理学门类、工学门类、医学门类、管理学门类中的表现等等，进一步从得分、高校属性、高校所在的地域探讨了这些院校学科建设水平的现状与格局。对获得不同层次成绩的学科，如在学科评估中获得较好成绩（如获得A 类等级）的学科、仍有较大进步空间的学科特别是弱势学科、仍未参评的学科，提出了不同的学科建设方面的建议。最后特别针对大部分地方师范类院校，提出“教育学科+ 特色学科”的学科建设模式。 |
| 关键词: 师范院校 学科 评估 排名 格局 |
| DOI： |
| Received:May 16, 2018Revised:August 26, 2018 |
| 基金项目: |
|
| Current Situation of Discipline Construction in Several Normal Universities in China——Based on the 2017 National Discipline Assessment Data |
| Tian Feng |
| (Institute of Higher Education， Guangdong Institute of Education， Guangzhou， Guangdong 510035) |
| Abstract: |
| Based on the data of subject evaluation in China in 2017， this paper analyzes the situation of subject evaluation in China's normal universities from different perspectives， and further studies the institutions which are in the forefront of the subject evaluation， and divides them into several groups， compares the subject strength of normal universities in different groups. The status and pattern of discipline construction level in humanities， arts， science， engineering， medicine and management disciplines are discussed from the aspects of scores， attributes of universities and regions of universities. Suggestions on the construction of different disciplines are put forward for disciplines with different grades， for example， for those with better grades（such as A） in subject evaluation， disciplines have greater room for progress， especially for those with weak disciplines and those are not yet evaluated. Finally， especially for most local normal colleges and universities， the "pedagogy + characteristic disciplines" discipline construction model is proposed. |
| Key words: Normal universities Disciplines Evaluation Ranking Pattern |
