| 摘要: |
| 电子过程评估是采用数字化手段日常性地记录教师线上的教学行为，然后依照预定的指标给予评价，终结性评价是在学期结束时对教师教学行为的一次性评价，多数是人工操作的。文章采用2019-2020年G大学的40 762份电子过程评估的数据与终结性评估的数据进行回归分析，发现两者存在显著性区别，而且发现这些区别与教师的职称高度相关。据此提出高校教师要 注意线上教学的特点，参照电子过程评估的指标改进自己的教学，尤其是年轻教师;同时对电子过 程评估提出要规范评估步骤、改进评估指标、自动地向老师进行教学情况反馈、加强评估结果对教 师的激励等建议。 |
| 关键词: 高等教育 教师评价 教学评价 电子过程评价 |
| DOI： |
|
| 基金项目:广东省教育厅 2020 年教学改革项目“基于电子过程评估的《健康保险学》在线教学效果评测与质量保障研究”。 |
|
| An Empirical Study on the Difference between Electronic Process Evaluation and SummativeEvaluation of Teaching Effects |
| LI Jianguo, LIANG Shitong, DENG Chengfang, ZENG Yuaner |
| (School of Public Health and Management, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510006) |
| Abstract: |
| Electronic process evaluation uses digital means to daily record teachers’online teaching behaviors and makes evaluation according to certain indicators, and summative evaluation makes one-off evaluation at the end of each semester, mostly done manually. In this paper, a regression analysis is conducted by using 40 762 electronic process evaluation and summative teaching evaluation data of G University from 2019 to 2020. It is found that there are significant differences between the two and they are highly correlated with the title of teachers. Therefore, the university teachers should pay attention to the characteristics of online teaching, improve their teaching according to indicators of electronic process evaluation, especially young teachers. At the same time, electronic process evaluation should standardize its basic steps, improve evaluation indicators, automatically provide feedbacks and strengthen the incentive of evaluation results to teachers. |
| Key words: Higher education Evaluation of teachers Teaching evaluation Electronic process evaluation |
