quotation:[Copy]
[Copy]
【Print page】 【Online reading】 【PDF Full text】 View/Add CommentDownload reader Close

←Previous page|Page Next →

Back Issue    Advanced search

This Paper:Browse 3269   Download 7158 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
中小学教师“国培计划”项目评估的框架
周家荣
0
(1. 昆明理工大学管理与经济学院,云南昆明 650093; 2. 云南省教育科学研究院评估室,云南昆明 650223)
摘要:
当前,教师培训普遍存在着针对性不强、内容泛化、方式单一、质量评估薄弱等问题,因此,迫切需要对“国培计划”项目开展专业评估。 实施“国培计划”项目评估,需要构建一个基本框架,对“国培计划”项目实施全面系统的评估,从而有力保障“国培计划”项目实施效果,构建教师培训的评估、诊断、改进、提升一体化机制,帮助不同培训主体更新培训理念,创新培训方式,增强培训能力,帮助教师培育反思精神,深层次促进教师专业发展,为提高教育质量奠定核心基础。
关键词:  国培计划  项目评估  评估框架  多元评估  分类评估  过程评估
DOI:
Received:August 04, 2017Revised:October 14, 2017
基金项目:基金项目: 2016 年中国博士后第 59 批科学基金面上资助项目“基础教育第三方评估机构能力建设研究”(2016M592896XB),2012 年国家社会科学基金教育学青年课题“云南人口较少民族义务教育质量调查研究”(CHA120139)。
A Framework for Evaluating the National Training Project for Elemental and Secondary School Teachers
Zhou Jiarong
(1.College of Economics and Management, Kunming University of Science and Technology,Kunming, Yunnan 650093;2.Evaluation Office, Yunnan Education Science Research Institute,Kunming, Yunnan 650223)
Abstract:
There are a number of problems in current teachers’ training, such as unclear aims, non-specific content, single method, insufficient quality evaluation and so on. Hence, it is urgent to carry out the professional evaluation for the national training project. Carrying out the national training project evaluation calls for the establishment of a basic framework, which designs different aspects comprehensively and systematically. In this way, it will ensure the effect of implementation, construct the integration mechanism of evaluation, diagnosis, improvement and promotion, help different training subjects update the training concept, convert the training methods and enhance the training ability, help teachers to cultivate the spirit of reflection and deepen the promotion of teachers’ professional development. Thus, it is possible to lay the core foundation for improving the quality of education.
Key words:  National training project  Program evaluation  Evaluation framework  Multiple evaluation  Classified evaluation  Process evaluation